Author |
Message |
< 16ga. General Discussion ~ help on a recoil argument |
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 2:00 pm
|
|
|
Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 3
Location: Tupelo, Texas
|
|
Was dove hunting in S. TX 2 weeks ago. Had a guy ask me why a 16?
Gave my stock answer,"carries like a 20 and hits like a 12"
He quickly told me he used a 12ga. light wght. gun(around 6.5 lbs.), and loaded 1 ounce of shot at 1200 fps, and said the recoil is no different than a comparable 16 load with a gun of comparable weight. In thinking about it I guess he is right, but I sure did not have the knowledge to get into a dabate over it. Can any of you guys shed some light on this for me?
Thanks in advance
TO16 |
_________________ After 12 yrs. on ballfields, it now time to hunt again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:03 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 781
|
|
You can find a 12 ga gun that is as light as a nice 16, (but almost all of them are not)
You can find a 12 ga shell with the same amount of shot and velocity as a nice 16 ga load. (but almost all of them are not)
When you do the recoil and handling may be similar if the stock dimensions etc are the same.
BUT the very rare 12 ga's that are as light and svelt as a nice 16 are usually exceedingly expensive.
So you can skin this cat from either direction, it's just that one direction is harder than the other.
I like both, but given the choice I'd rather have a 16 ga gun with proper proportions than an anorexic 12 ga that a dedicated maker spent a lot of time and effort trying to get it to be like a 16.
Jeff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:23 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 2016
Location: Glendale, AZ
|
|
What Jeff said.
Recoil is COMPLETELY a function of velocity and weight of the shot charge, and the weight of the gun:12, 16, .410 shotgun, rifle, or pistol.
FELT recoil is much more complicated, is quite individual but not necessarily reproducible, is significantly impacted by gun fit and stock dimensions/style, fixed breech (SxS, O/U) vs gas autoloader (1100, 391) vs recoil action (A5s and Benellis), brl porting, and a host of other variables. Perceived recoil may be brutal while pattern testing but might not even be noticed when shooting a pheasant.
Bottom line: a 12 O/U weighing the same as a 16 O/U both shooting 1 oz loads at 1165 have the same recoil (but 16ers still have more fun ) |
_________________ Drew Hause
http://sites.google.com/a/damascusknowledge.com/www/home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:28 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 2172
Location: Kansas High Plains
|
|
Give him the other stock answer: 12 gauges look funny !
Fin |
_________________ I feel a warm spot in my heart when I meet a man whiling away an afternoon...and stopping to chat with him, hear the sleek lines of his double gun whisper "Sixteen." - Gene Hill, Shotgunner's Notebook |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:27 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 740
Location: New England, home of fat teddy k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:04 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 711
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
|
|
His light weight 12 may weigh the same and have the same amount of recoil with equal weight loads but it is still a 12 gauge. What I am getting at is the barrels are larger diameter which makes the dimensions of the gun in width and height greater both in the action and the barrels. It will also be deeper in height at the forearm. It just won't have that 16 gauge feel Kinda like the difference between swinging a baseball bat and a fence post OK, it's really not that different but there is a difference.
Besides, there is the "cool" factor that comes with a 16ga. that a 12ga. just doesn't have.
Dennis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Hey Rev you have been listening after all! Good going.
Now lets work of divorcing chamber pressure from recoil. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:59 pm
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 3438
Location: Illinois
|
|
You listen to some clown shooting a 12 My money says he has never loaded a shell,actually fixed his own gun or done much hunting other than from a magazine Don't take yourself to his level.There is a formula for recoil on the Hodgdon site www.hodgdon.com if you are interested----Those that don't load for/shoot/understand the 16 are lost and rarely ever see the light |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:03 am
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 596
Location: Massachusetts
|
|
revdocdrew wrote: |
Perceived recoil may be brutal while pattern testing but might not even be noticed when shooting a pheasant.
|
Now that you mention it, I never do feel the recoil when shooting at ducks... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:59 am
|
|
|
Member
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 6535
Location: massachusetts
|
|
You should have watched him shoot, then if you were better, just down your birds with more elan, and as you leave sniff, "12 ga? I don't need no 12 ga.... I don't need no stinking 12 Ga." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 07, 2006 2:05 am
|
|
|
|
Revdoc said, "Perceived recoil may be brutal while pattern testing but might not even be noticed when shooting a pheasant."
I've found that true. I've got a Beretta 686S Ultralight 12 ga. that I carried for several years for pheasants. Felt recoil, even with 1 1/4 oz Federal Premiums, has never bothered me in the field. Pheasant hunting, I rarely notice recoil. That said, shoot more than two boxes of even 1 oz loads through it on the skeet field, it's a pain in the shoulder and the cheek.
I think Square Load is right, too -- my 16 actually weighs more (no alloy receiver), but actually feels/handles sweeter.
I don't think I'll sell that ultralight 12, though, even though a couple guys have offered me what I have in it. It's been a good gun ... bobble free and shoots where I point it. I'll hold onto it if for no other reason than backup/loaner duty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 07, 2006 3:31 am
|
|
|
Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 145
Location: minnesota
|
|
mgf:
a 686s is one damn nice loaner gun
you wouldn't have a 20ga citori xs skeet laying around for me to use, would you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted:
Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:31 pm
|
|
|
|
87016ga wrote: |
mgf:
a 686s is one damn nice loaner gun
you wouldn't have a 20ga citori xs skeet laying around for me to use, would you
|
Sorry ... no Citoris in the safe. But if we were hunting together, I'd let you borrow one of my spaghetti guns.
And, to tell the truth, although it's been a beaut when it comes to reliability, my ultralight 686 is plain as plain gets. Black matte finish and some of the most drab walnut I've ever seen (if it is walnut). But it's a light, quick gun that shoots true. One thing, though ... can't forget to "drive" that gun at all. Light as it is, there's no forgiveness if you don't follow through on the swing.
Ya know, I've never put a second gun in the truck before, but I'm going to start this year. Too few outings per year and too long of drives to have one of 'em ruined by a malfunctioning gun. It's never happened to me before, but you hang around long enough ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|