16ga.com Forum Index
Author Message
<  16ga. Ammunition & Reloading  ~  Does Hull Length Really Make a Difference?
Ed Blake
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:46 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Location: MANAKIN, VA

I have read many of the past posts devoted to the subject of 2.5 vs. 2.75" hulls. From what I can determine if a low pressure load is used with the noted components, and a roll crimp, the length of the hull should not make a difference. Correct?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
revdocdrew
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:05 am  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 2016
Location: Glendale, AZ

From the 'Chamber Length' announcement on the 'Guns' Forum, a quote by Sherman Bell:

"With loads that are sensible in a light 2 1/2 inch gun, we see no dangerous pressure levels produced. I see no reason, related to safety, to modify an original 2 1/2 inch chambered gun to shoot 2 3/4 shells, If The 2 3/4 Inch Load You Intend To Use Would Develop Pressure That Is Safe In That Gun, When Fired In A Standard Chamber!

His studies showed no more than a 300 psi increase shooting 2 3/4" shells in a short chamber.
Be aware however, that some 2 1/2" nominal chambers are cut closer to 2 3/8" (like my 20g 1922 Trojan) and recoil is wicked with 2 3/4" AA target loads.

_________________
Drew Hause
http://sites.google.com/a/damascusknowledge.com/www/home
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dave Miles
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 11:06 am  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 1545
Location: Michigan

Ed. This is correct. Your main concern should be that the load you are shooting is of the proper pressure. Shooting a 6000 PSI, 2-3/4" load in a gun chambered at 2-9/16" might raise the pressure a couple hundred psi.
I shoot 2-3/4" loads in my 2-5/8" chambered 12 gauges. And 2-3/4" loads in my 2-9/16" chambered 16 gauge guns. If you measure a bunch of factory 2-3/4" shells, you'll find allot of them are under that length.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chukarman
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:52 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 173
Location: S. E. Arizona

I regularly shoot Win AA16 hulls with light (low pressure) loads in my 5 lb. 9 ounce Harkom with 2-1/2" chambers. These loads use 20 grns of 7625, R16 wad, and CCI 209 primers. I think they produce <7000 PSI.

The big thing is a lower pressure load comensurate with the proof level of the gun. 1/4" of chamber length is not a big deal.

C Man

_________________
Country to hunt, my setters, and a Fox 16 gauge...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jeff Mulliken
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:31 pm  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 781

Pressure aside, longer than spec. hull length does make a difference in autoloaders and pumps.

Some of the earlier guns made for short shells will not eject the 2 3/4 in shells.

Jeff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chukarman
PostPosted: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:54 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 22 Dec 2004
Posts: 173
Location: S. E. Arizona

Jeff Mulliken wrote:
Pressure aside, longer than spec. hull length does make a difference in autoloaders and pumps.

Some of the earlier guns made for short shells will not eject the 2 3/4 in shells.

Jeff


Jeff

Quite right! I forget that not everyone shoots a breakk open gun.

_________________
Country to hunt, my setters, and a Fox 16 gauge...

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Larry Brown
PostPosted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:23 pm  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 743

I've always shot low pressure 2 3/4" reloads in 2 1/2" chambered doubles with no problems. However, there is one caveat to that advice: very old guns (usually Damascus) with extremely short, sharply tapered forcing cones. Charles Fergus reported on an incident with one of those once, in Shooting Sportsman. He wasn't using reloads, but rather British 67MM shells, CIP proof, designed for 2 1/2" guns (it'll tell you the latter information, right on the shell box). They worked fine in his newer (30's vintage) Brit gun, but resulted in extremely sharp recoil and blown ends on the hulls in a gun from, I think, the 1880's. When he tried true 2 1/2" shells in that older gun, they worked fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ed Blake
PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:57 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 20 Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Location: MANAKIN, VA

Thank you for the replies. I have an 1889 16 ga. Remington that I have shot both 2.5" and 2 3/4" shells. I watched for deformation on the ends of the 2 3/4", but it seems the shells opened just fine. Information from the 16GA LPG has provided several loads using Unique and Longshot powders with under 5,500 psi. A current article in the on-line publication Double Gun Classics talks about reaming short chambers out to 2 3/4". The author said sharp shoulders seemed to be prevelant in European guns more so than American or British.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 7 Hours

View next topic
View previous topic
Page 1 of 1
16ga.com Forum Index  ~  16ga. Ammunition & Reloading

Post new topic   Reply to topic


 
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB and NoseBleed v1.09