16ga.com Forum Index
Author Message
<  16ga. Ammunition & Reloading  ~  16 Remington black hulls
RGuill96971
PostPosted: Sat Feb 22, 2020 7:29 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 21 Mar 2019
Posts: 523
Location: Texas

Anyone have load data for the Remington black hulls cut down to 2 1/2? Some people say load them like 2 3/4? Any help would be appreciated. [/i]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Byron Whitlock
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 8:07 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 490
Location: Oswego, Kansas

I have had good luck loading RP hulls cut to 21/2" using a normal load with SG16 wads and roll crimping them. These hulls roll crimp well and I don't have the hassle of adjusting my MEC loader all the time. The Rem hulls are not a full 23/4 anyway so cutting a little off and roll crimping them works fine for me.

_________________
Sweet sixteen forever
LC Smith Field Grade
LC Smith Ideal Grade
CZ Ringneck
Win. Model 12
Rem M11
Stevens 235
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
RGuill96971
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 8:20 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 21 Mar 2019
Posts: 523
Location: Texas

Ok sounds good. Thank you. Just wanted to see if anyone was doing this, before I experimented with it. Haven’t figured why there is no tested load data on these being cut to 2 1/2 yet. All I seen was fiocchi cut down. Thanks again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MSM2019
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 8:39 am  Reply with quote



Joined: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 1842
Location: Central ND

If you are just cutting them down to roll crimp, there is no reason to change the data from what you are using for a fold crimp. The ballistics are very comparable.

Not a guess, I have done the work to be sure that is true.

_________________
Mark...You are entitled to your own opinion. You aren't entitled to your own facts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
old colonel
PostPosted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 8:11 pm  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Dec 2008
Posts: 605
Location: Topeka, Kansas

MSM2019 wrote:
If you are just cutting them down to roll crimp, there is no reason to change the data from what you are using for a fold crimp. The ballistics are very comparable.

Not a guess, I have done the work to be sure that is true.


Concur with poster.

That said PM sent

_________________
Michael
Topeka, KS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MaximumSmoke
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 7:46 am  Reply with quote
Member
Member


Joined: 01 Dec 2005
Posts: 1550
Location: Minnesota and Florida

Why cut them at all. Most are around 2 5/8 inch (67 mm) already. If you have 2 9/16 inch chambers (US 16 ga. guns), or 65mm chambers (typical older Continental 16 ga. guns), your good to go as is. Even if your chambers are actually 2 1/2 (some old British 16's), with zero forcing cones, you might want to trim, but you don't need to take off 1/4 inch, only an eighth, and those can easily be loaded with just a crimp height adjustment on your loader.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Byron Whitlock
PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:22 pm  Reply with quote



Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 490
Location: Oswego, Kansas

I agree with maximum smoke. They work fine as is in my elsies but when the crimps wear out I trim them down and roll crimp them.

_________________
Sweet sixteen forever
LC Smith Field Grade
LC Smith Ideal Grade
CZ Ringneck
Win. Model 12
Rem M11
Stevens 235
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 7 Hours

View next topic
View previous topic
Page 1 of 1
16ga.com Forum Index  ~  16ga. Ammunition & Reloading

Post new topic   Reply to topic


 
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB and NoseBleed v1.09